A unique opportunity to look at the international use and impact of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire, an important workplace mental health/stress prevention survey tool
OHCOW is hosting the biannual COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) Network meeting in Hamilton on May 11 & 12 which will discuss the technicalities of the survey and its use around the world. We have deliberately scheduled it in May to intersect with our annual Mayday, Mayday Symposium on Workplace Mental Health and Injury Prevention. Research into Practice is a combined event including our regular audience of worker activists and advocates, Workers Compensation and OHS professionals, regulators, and researchers as well as others interested in the COPSOQ from around the world. This is one of three virtual sessions as a complement to the full-day, in-person* Joint COPSOQ & OHCOW Network Meeting in Hamilton, ON.
Agenda:
9:30 – 11:00 am
A. Canadian Survey Results and Trends
Agenda:
Canadian National Survey Results & Trends: How Stressed are We?
The Big Picture, Data Analysis, Details and Patterns, John Oudyk
The Current Story – Qualitative Comments, Daryl Stephenson
Finding trends – Comparing 2016, 2019 and Today, John Oudyk
Discussion, All
11:30 am – 1:00 pm
B. Survey Use and Challenges in Canada
Agenda:
StressAssess Success Stories
Short “Pulse” survey experience
Logistic and Cultural Challenges from Manitoba perspective
2:00 – 3:30 pm
C. Workplace Mental Health Survey Use Around the World
Agenda:
New US Healthy Worker Survey Update, Dr. Marnie Dobson,
International Survey Highlights, COPSOQ Network Panel
Discussion: Use of WMH Surveys given existential risks like war, disease and climate change?, All
consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer vitae aliquam leo, et hendrerit sem. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec elementum eleifend massa ut lobortis. Ut mattis erat sed ante aliquet, a euismod felis dictum. Donec cursus, dui quis ullamcorper hendrerit, massa felis hendrerit nisi, at viverra leo magna eget orci. Quisque gravida, lacus id consectetur pellentesque, mauris nisl consectetur massa, fermentum iaculis tortor nulla eget nulla. Vestibulum libero nulla, sodales id ante vel, dignissim fringilla risus. Cras et eleifend nulla. Donec rhoncus tempus mollis. In commodo velit eu dignissim dapibus. Mauris vitae sapien augue.
Nullam lacinia nulla at lacus lobortis tempus viverra et magna. Nulla pulvinar tempus mauris et condimentum. Curabitur vestibulum laoreet nunc a dapibus. Suspendisse rutrum fringilla magna, non accumsan urna posuere accumsan. Donec eleifend nibh nec risus semper viverra. Cras gravida elementum congue. Nunc sit amet blandit est, eu elementum metus. Morbi nec lacus lorem. Morbi tincidunt nunc a fringilla varius. Morbi lobortis libero nec felis consequat luctus. Sed eros libero, luctus id justo condimentum, lobortis congue lorem. Nam facilisis commodo sollicitudin. Donec arcu massa, viverra quis lobortis vitae, vestibulum in turpis.
Nullam imperdiet ac mi id fermentum. Vestibulum sit amet leo at purus tincidunt dignissim ut non erat. Nam auctor faucibus egestas. Aenean sit amet massa tortor. Nam sed nunc sit amet justo pulvinar efficitur. Ut tempor sollicitudin erat nec dignissim. Suspendisse vel condimentum purus, molestie tristique neque. Nulla eu turpis dolor. Etiam quis lorem luctus, commodo purus at, scelerisque nisl. Fusce in sollicitudin nunc, non mollis velit. Vivamus at maximus libero, vitae sagittis libero. Nam sed nisl turpis. Pellentesque id cursus nunc. Cras interdum nisi sit amet porttitor vehicula.
Heat Stress Toolkit Overview
95% Confidence Interval (CI)
95% Confidence Interval (CI) is a range of values (upper and lower) that you can be 95% certain contains the true mean of the population.
Relative Risk (RR)
The relative risk is a comparison of the risk of getting lung cancer for those exposed to diesel exhaust compared to those who have never been exposed to diesel exhaust – for example, if the relative risk is 1.5, it means that for the cumulative diesel exhaust exposure entered into the calculator, the risk associated with that exposure is 1.5 times higher than the background risk of lung cancer for those who have not been occupationally exposed to diesel exhaust.